Second, you can write the review solely for the purpose of using it to form the introduction to your thesis. The difference in the two approaches is how comprehensive the review needs to be. If planning for publication, your review will need more sources and more thorough coverage; if it is used just for the thesis or for the lab, it can be more specific, more tailored, and less narratively satisfying. If you need to write a review article but don't know where to start, keep some of these tips in mind. It is not enough to summarise the research literature. You need to show you understand the relevance and significance of the different publications, and how they relate to each other. 21. Ridley D (2008) The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. London: SAGE. 31. Michels C, Schmoch U (2013) Impact of bibliometric studies on the publication behaviour of authors. Scientometrics doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1015-7. In press. 9. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2. 238–247 doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x 32. Tsafnat G, Dunn A, Glasziou P, Coiera E (2013) The automation of systematic reviews. BMJ 346. f139 doi:10.1136/bmj.f139 [PubMed ] 23. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1988) Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ 138. 697–703. [PMC free article ] [PubMed ] the main areas of debate, and do not just look for research papers in the area you wish to review essay on university life, but also seek previous reviews. How to choose which topic to review? There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to review. On the one hand, if you take several years to choose, several other people may have had the same idea in the meantime. On the other hand write my admission essay writing, only a well-considered topic is likely to lead to a brilliant literature review [8]. The topic must at least be: Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications [1]. For example, compared to 1991, in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria best custom college papers, obesity roman empire essays, and biodiversity, respectively [2]. Given such mountains of papers, scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail every single new paper relevant to their interests [3]. Thus, it is both advantageous and necessary to rely on regular summaries of the recent literature. Although recognition for scientists mainly comes from primary research starting of essay introductions, timely literature reviews can lead to new synthetic insights and are often widely read [4]. For such summaries to be useful, however, they need to be compiled in a professional way [5] . 4. Hampton SE, Parker JN (2011) Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. Bioscience 61. 900–910 doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.9 12. Khoo CSG, Na JC, Jaidka K (2011) Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews. Online Info Rev 35. 255–271 doi:10.1108/14684521111128032 In general, a review of the literature should neither be a public relations brochure nor an exercise in competitive self-denial. If a reviewer is up to the job of producing a well-organized and methodical review, which flows well and provides a service to the readership essays about writing process, then it should be possible to be objective in reviewing one's own relevant findings. In reviews written by multiple authors, this may be achieved by assigning the review of the results of a coauthor to different coauthors. Given the progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers good websites for homework help, today's reviews of the literature need awareness not just of the overall direction and achievements of a field of inquiry, but also of the latest studies, so as not to become out-of-date before they have been published. Ideally, a literature review should not identify as a major research gap an issue that has just been addressed in a series of papers in press (the same applies, of course, to older essay about my pet cat, overlooked studies (“sleeping beauties” [26] )). This implies that literature reviewers would do well to keep an eye on electronic lists of papers in press, given that it can take months before these appear in scientific databases. Some reviews declare that they have scanned the literature up to a certain point in time, but given that peer review can be a rather lengthy process essay writing made simple, a full search for newly appeared literature at the revision stage may be worthwhile. Assessing the contribution of papers that have just appeared is particularly challenging, because there is little perspective with which to gauge their significance and impact on further research and society. Feedback is vital to writing a good review, and should be sought from a variety of colleagues, so as to obtain a diversity of views on the draft. This may lead in some cases to conflicting views on the merits of the paper, and on how to improve it professional essay writing services india, but such a situation is better than the absence of feedback. A diversity of feedback perspectives on a literature review can help identify where the consensus view stands in the landscape of the current scientific understanding of an issue [24] . incorporating new material that has inevitably accumulated since their appearance. 3. Erren TC, Cullen P, Erren M (2009) How to surf today's information tsunami: on the craft of effective reading. Med Hypotheses 73. 278–279 doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.05.002 [PubMed ] 16. Eco U (1977) Come si fa una tesi di laurea. Milan: Bompiani. the major achievements in the reviewed field, After having chosen your topic and audience, start by checking the literature and downloading relevant papers. Five pieces of advice here: use different keywords and database sources (e.g. DBLP, Google Scholar, ISI Proceedings, JSTOR Search, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science), and When starting from scratch, reviewing the literature can require a titanic amount of work. That is why researchers who have spent their career working on a certain research issue are in a perfect position to review that literature. Some graduate schools are now offering courses in reviewing the literature, given that most research students start their project by producing an overview of what has already been done on their research issue [6]. However, it is likely that most scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and carry out a literature review. In many cases examples of topics for expository essay, reviewers of the literature will have published studies relevant to the review they are writing. This could create a conflict of interest: how can reviewers report objectively on their own work [25]. Some scientists may be overly enthusiastic about what they have published, and thus risk giving too much importance to their own findings in the review. However, bias could also occur in the other direction: some scientists may be unduly dismissive of their own achievements, so that they will tend to downplay their contribution (if any) to a field when reviewing it. 6. Boote DN, Beile P (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res 34. 3–15 doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003 14. Cook DA, West CP (2012) Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ 46. 943–952 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04328.x [PubMed ] 10. Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL (2011) Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Acad Med 86. 1049–1054 doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822221e7 [PubMed ]
0 Comentarios
Deja una respuesta. |
ArchivosCategorías |