Sorry but did you re-read this at all while you were typing this or, it's that or that you know some fancy words and don't know some basic rules. In short, despite the fact that people in free societies have difference in opinion, it is the duty of policy makers to keep the people informed and up to date when making decisions on their behalf. There is no justification for doing otherwise because freedom starts with a voice. ***** Second, it is necessary to understand common people’s thought about any norms before it has been made. The Government, which only can be created by people’s opinion and their vote because without them everything can become fuzzy however freedom of speech should be allowed in such necessary circumstances. Furthermore format for writing papers in college, education, economic factors, medical, agriculture, info-tech and so on are run by common people who do anything to compete with the world. So the society is only govern by their potentiality and capabilities and knowhow of all their desire tendencies which gives rising up gradation for making a nation brighter. So government should know what citizens needs in different field in civilized society. Can someone please review and give a possible band score for my freedom of speech essay. Thank you:) Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? Give reasons for you answer. Man as rational being desires to do many things, but in a civil society his desires have to be controlled, regulated and reconciled with the exercise of similar desires by other individuals. The guarantee of each of the above right is, therefore, restricted by the Constitution in the larger interest of the community. The right to freedom of speech and expression is subject to limitations imposed under Article 19(2). Article 19(1)(a) of Indian Constitution says that all citizens have the right to freedom of speech and expression. Freedom of Speech and expression means the right to express one's own convictions and opinions freely by words of mouth, writing, printing, pictures or any other mode. It thus includes the expression of one's idea through any communicable medium or visible representation, such as gesture, signs, and the like. This expression connotes also publication and thus the freedom of press is included in this category. Free propagation of ideas is the necessary objective and this may be done on the platform or through the press. This propagation of ideas is secured by freedom of circulation. Liberty of circulation is essential to that freedom as the liberty of publication. Indeed, without circulation the publication would be of little value. The freedom of speech and expression includes liberty to propagate not one's views only. It also includes the right to propagate or publish the views of other people; otherwise this freedom would not include the freedom of press. 6) Defamation: A statement, which injures a man's reputation japanese festival essays, amounts to defamation. Defamation consists in exposing a man to hatred, ridicule, or contempt. The civil law in relating to defamation is still uncodified in India and subject to certain exceptions. 8) Sedition: As understood by English law, sedition embraces all those practices whether by words, or writing which are calculated to disturb the tranquility of the State and lead ignorant person to subvert the government. It should be noted that the sedition is not mentioned in clause (2) of Art. 19 as one of the grounds on which restrictions on freedom of speech and expression may be imposed. In the case of Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi (AIR 1950 SC 129) examples of short essays about life, the validity of censorship previous to the publication of an English Weekly of Delhi, the Organiser was questioned. The court struck down the Section 7 of the East Punjab Safety Act resume cover letters, 1949 topics to write an essay, which directed the editor and publisher of a newspaper “to submit for scrutiny, in duplicate, before the publication, till the further orders. all communal matters all the matters and news and views about Pakistan, including photographs essay on smoking kills, and cartoons", on the ground that it was a restriction on the liberty of the press. Similarly, prohibiting newspaper from publishing its own views or views of correspondents about a topic has been held to be a serious encroachment on the freedom of speech and expression. Freedom of expression has four broad special purposes to serve: Telephone Tapping: Invasion on right to privacy. Telephone tapping violates Art. 19(1)(a) unless it comes within grounds of restriction under Art. 19(2). Under the guidelines laid down by the Court, the Home Secretary of the center and state governments can only issue an order for telephone tapping. The order is subject to review by a higher power review committee and the period for telephone tapping cannot exceed two months unless approved by the review authority. 3) It strengthens the capacity of an individual in participating in decision-making. Government has no monopoly on electronic media: The Supreme Court widened the scope and extent of the right to freedom of speech and expression and held that the government has no monopoly on electronic media and a citizen has under Art. 19(1)(a) a right to telecast and broadcast to the viewers/listeners through electronic media television and radio any important event. The government can impose restrictions on such a right only on grounds specified in clause (2) of Art. 19 and not on any other ground. A citizen has fundamental right to use the best means of imparting and receiving communication and as such have an access to telecasting for the purpose. From the above case law analysis it is evident that the Court has always placed a broad interpretation on the value and content of Article 19(1)(a), making it subjective only to the restrictions permissible under Article 19(2). Efforts by intolerant authorities to curb or suffocate this freedom have always been firmly repelled, more so when public authorities have betrayed autocratic tendencies. Public order as a ground of imposing restrictions was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951. Public order is something more than ordinary maintenance of law and order. Public order in the present context is synonymous with public peace, safety and tranquility. If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the LawTeacher website then please click on the link below to request removal: The fact that both the "right to freedom of speech and expression" (article 19(1)(a)) and "right to assemble peaceably and without arms" (article 19(1)(b)) share the same article highlights the fact that both these rights are dependent on each other in more than one ways. Many prominent columnists and writers are of the view that the mass protests under the leadership of Anna Hazare along with other social activists comprised the first well-organized movement after the Jai Prakash Naryan movement. Given the fact that people today are being more and more oblivious to others' lives, it is extremely difficult to organize such a hugely popular movement which has to its credit samples of thesis topics, if not any visible changes in legislation scholarships no essay required, the herculean task of tying the youth of the nation with a common feeling of rationality and self-realization. And the judgement of the Supreme Court, while laying down a landmark law inasmuch as it upholds the right to protest as a fundamental right of speech and assemble homework help university, shakes the very basic foundation of the fundamental rights by stating that if denied the right to protest, people should unconditionally accept the denial. However latex phdthesis, it would be foolish to assume that both these rights could be distinguished as apples and mangoes. Hence, the freedom of speech and expression can be exercised under all normal circumstances, which makes it a very powerful weapon in our democracy, possibly more powerful than any other fundamental right provided to the citizens of the nation. Since ancient times, man has attached great importance to his fundamental right of expression. He regarded this right as his proud possession. He defended this right with all his might. If necessary, he even laid down his life to uphold this precious right. History is replete with examples of thousands of men, women, intellectuals, philosophers, artists, writers, politicians, etc, having fought and sacrificed their lives for the sake of this freedom. Galileo, a scientist different topics for essays, declared on the basis of research and study that the Earth is not the centre of universe and that it revolves around the Sun and not vice versa. But Galileo had to face a lot of persecution for expressing a view which went counter to the popular belief of the church at that time. During the Mughal rule in India, the Sikh Gurus preached what they thought was right but the Mughal rulers did not relish this freedom. They persecuted the Sikh Gurus for their beliefs. Thus, Guru Arjun Dev, the fifth Guru of the Sikhs was made to sit on hot iron plates. Bhai Mati Das was sawed into two. Guru Teg Bahadur was beheaded in Delhi. The young sons of Guru Gobind Singh were buried alive in a wall.
0 Comentarios
Deja una respuesta. |
ArchivosCategorías |