Aristotle on Friendship, Essays, School Essays, Essays on Philosophy, aristotle essay on friendship.3/29/2017 Aristotle on Friendship Essay about Theories of Love and Friendship - Relationships and friendships have evolved significantly over the centuries. Quality of life was influenced by accepted practices related to theories of love and friendship. Exploring Medieval Europe and modern day approaches to relationships provide a clear illustration of how relationships have positively evolved over time. Theories of love and friendship have emerged from the early medieval period over 2000 years ago with notable theories from Plato and Aristotle. Plato (428-348 or 347 B.C.) was an ancient Greek Philosopher and pivotal figure in the history of western thought. [tags: Relationships examples essay writing help, Friendship Essays] 1142 words
2390 words In Search of Virtue in Honors Essays - In Search of Virtue in Honors Of the three forms of friendship discussed by Aristotle—the useful, the pleasant, and the good—the ideal seminar most resembles the perfectly good friendship between “good men who are alike in excellence or virtue” (Aristotle 1156b). A seminar, the Swarthmore website reads topics of essays for class 5, unites faculty with “small groups of dedicated and accomplished students” committed to “independent learning” and “dialogue with peers, teachers writing a reflection paper in apa format, and examiners.” In light of Aristotelian and neo-Aristotelian thought on friendship, virtue and practical wisdom, this discussion will first examine how an ideal seminar promotes student virtues and then proceed to evaluate an e-mail I wrote in re. [tags: Aristotle Friendship Philosophy Essays] Essay on Nicomachean Ethics: Friendship, Virtue and Happiness - In the writings of Aristotle, seen in Nicomachean Ethics words for essays to start paragraph, it is evident that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a virtuous and therefore happy life. I believe that this is accurate due to the similar conditions necessary for a complete friendship and a happy life. It is also evident that friendship is useful in achieving a happy life because friendship can make performing virtuous actions easier. His interpretation can be misunderstood and mistakes in practice can be made, so we will need to discuss these follies as well, in order to understand all the effects of friendship on achieving a happy life. [tags: Philosophy, Aristotle 2014]
1915 words Aristotle seems to have accepted this analysis, and augmented it with an explanation of just how to understand friendship with one's neighbors. He says, The obvious problem with this interpretation is that it cannot account for Aristotle's blatant favoritism for friends over strangers. What could possibly be the difference? Either everyone is everyone else's friend, or only good people' nous are identical with each other. The former is unsupported by the text; the latter is inconsistent with the metaphysics. (Note well that this nonsense is the result of Kahn's attempt to read altruism into Aristotle.) Nous is its true self when separated. So it is not essentially differentiated how you write an argumentative essay, even when connected with several mortal psyches. That means that my nous is really identical with everyone else's. So in loving my nous. I love everyone else's. Kahn, Charles. "Aristotle and Altruism," in Mind (1981) Vol. 90, pp. 20-40. Plato. Collected Dialogues. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961. Only the good are consistent. Only the consistent can be like. Only the like can be friends either with themselves or with others. And real friendship, according to Aristotle, occurs only among the good. It may be helpful here to add that life is choiceworthy in itself, and that's why one acts on one's own behalf. The internally inconsistent person can find life choiceworthy; but in acting, he must act on the behalf of a whole bunch of different "selves" whose interests conflict, so he must perform the act of self-preservation and self-benefit very poorly. Kraut, Richard. Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989. I'll wrap up with a comment on Kahn's interpretation of the derivation of philia-to-others from philia-to-self. This interpretation takes the undifferentiatedness of nous to be the basis of the possibility of friendship. Aristotle identifies the core of one's personality with one's thinking part. The self is nous. The good person recognizes this and loves his nous. Friends must live together, or they really only have goodwill (1157b19-24). Julia Annas argues that this notion of friendship is too narrow to go along with the list of people that Aristotle says are friends. For example, I am supposed to be friends with my ruler; but I can't live with him. A person may have all of these reasons for behaving in a certain way toward people and still not be involved in true friendship. Friendship implies mutual liking ("Hence, [to be friends] they must have goodwill to each other, wish goods and be aware of it. "(1156a35)). No matter how much he loves some person, he and that person can only be friends if the object of his love loves him too. True friendship is not something you can engage in with more than a couple of people. Complete friendship is "like an excess, and an excess is naturally directed at a single individual practice essay writing online," and you can't please a lot of people all at once (1158a11-14). It is easy to field this one for Aristotle. He would say that such a pair are not friends. He might allow that we can like such people; but he would not allow that it is mutual liking, because bad people are too internally inconsistent to like anyone. Furthermore essay on responsibility of parents, Annas's claim that such pairings are instances of friendship is opposed to what we usually hear people say: "I like the work that person does, but we could never be friends, because he is dishonest (is a lush, is a hustler, has no self-respect, etc.)" It seems that we can call people 'friends' even when we disapprove of their actions only because of the good we see in them: "You don't know what he's really like because you only see the harsh part--but he is quite brave in a rough situation." And, although these people are not friends in the truest sense essay shopping online, still they might be considered friends in one of the derivative senses--but they probably won't remain friends for long. Some people are just naturally friends, like parents and children essays on war of, and members of the same species (1155a16-22). And some people are called 'friends ' in virtue of their proximity or community with each other or their common concerns. Such people would include One of the problems that Aristotle is trying to solve with all this is from the Lysis. according to Julia Annas: Why does the good person need friends? The good person is complete; friends are of no use to him custom writing for dissertation, since he has no deficiencies to fill. This will give us all the more reason to think that the true definition of friendship must be understood in terms of the good person's relationship to himself, rather than just anybody's relationship to himself. So talking about friendship must involve talking about good people. Annas is not pleased with the solution. In finding that a person's wanting something for the sake of someone else can be explained by the primary case of wanting something for oneself simply because it is oneself, "Aristotle might well be thought to make egoistic desires conceptually prior after all, because altruistic desires only enter in as a matter of psychological fact" (Annas, p. 543). The primary case of desiring good to someone for that person's sake is the one in which a person desires something for himself.
0 Comentarios
Deja una respuesta. |
ArchivosCategorías |